Concept: 1 out of 5
Execution: 0 out of 5
Yeah, but: I seem to be the only one who cares.
The Long Version: I don't know if it's because of Star Trek, Dungeons and Dragons, or the critically-acclaimed cinematic masterpiece "Hollow Man", but many cyclists seem to think that being invisible is a good idea.
Now, if people decide that their safety isn't worth the $15-20 that a decent set of lights—or the fine for not having one—will cost, I'm not one to argue. But when cyclists choose to endanger my own safety by riding unlit, I have a big problem with that. It's enough to make me wish for a massive police enforcement effort—we seize the cars of people who drive too dangerously, don't we?
Although a certain amount of collective responsibility is inevitable on the roads, depending on someone else to ensure your own personal safety is inherently unsafe. Why not do everything possible to make things easier for the people that you depend on to not kill you?
Riding with only a tail light is a perfect example of someone who has half-considered their own protection. Cars that are overtaking bikes are going to be using their headlights, and have a much slower closing speed. That might be why it's only a front light that's required by law—for the rear of the bike a light or reflector is acceptable.
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Thewsreviews only permits comments from its associate authors. If that's you, awesome and thanks. If not, you can find the main email address on this page, or talk to us on Twitter.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.